I just returned from our community's "ecumenical" thanksgiving service. It was an interesting experience for me. The service ran smoothly, the combined choir sang beautifully, the officiants all looked very official in their white robes (with the exception of the Presbyterian who wore a black robe). It was a thoroughly traditional service, although the prayer of confession and assurance of pardon were missing.
I spent the service sitting in the pews with the congregation, not coming within 100 feet of a microphone. Following the service several members of our congregation mentioned that they had hoped I would be participating in the service. I assured them that I was a participant, I just wasn't wearing robes and standing up front.
As I looked around the congregation I realized that at 41 I was one of the youngest people there and I began to ask myself why? I wondered if it was people's busy schedules that kept them away and then realized that we all set priorities and make to those things we deem important, so this was clearly not important to the 40 and younger crowd. But why would this not be an important event to my age group and younger?
I think the answer can be found in the emphasis on diversity that is placed on the younger generations. We don't see the disunity that requires a service of this kind. We don't care if you are Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Lutheran, Evangelical Free, CMA, Roman Catholic, Anglican, UCC or whatever other label you attach. Indeed every worship service is in some way "ecumenical" as people from different walks of life come together to worship God under one roof.
I think my generation and younger are much less interested in the formal "ecumenism" of a worship service like this than they are in the ongoing relationships among people. It is no big deal for me or my children to be involved with more than one faith community at a time.
As I sat in my pew I was also struck by the groups that were missing, we had Catholics, Presbyterians, Methodists, UCC and ELCA. But we didn't have any Evangelical Free, CMA, Baptist, Pentecostal or Independent congregations represented. Why was that? Were they not invited to the table, were they not interested in sitting at the table (actually we never did gather round the table because our ecumenism can not extend to sharing communion, but that's another issue).
I mentioned that the service was thoroughly traditional, I wonder what it might have been like if we had invited the folks from Eaglebrook, the local mega-church, to lead the singing with their guitars and drums? Would this be acceptable to those in attendance if it drew a greater part of our community to worship together?
Growing up in Northern Ireland I've attended all sorts of ecumenical gatherings. The most powerful being the one at the Kings Hall following the Enniskillen bombing, were several thousand young people gathered for cross community worship to state that we are one in Christ. If the purpose of the service this evening was to offer a traditional worship for those who would like to celebrate Thanksgiving in this way then it was a success, absolutely fantastic. However if there is another purpose for it then I don't think I understood what it was and I don't think it was achieved.
Personally, I enjoyed it for what it was and it was great to see several members of our congregation participating in this community event.
Recent Comments